Has any political, religious, or social organisation, even for record’s sake, or any official department ever bothered to keep an authentic record of sufferings, collateral damages to mankind, monetary and other losses during the Partition of the nation, which actually was only of united Punjab subsequently trifurcating into Himachal Pradesh and Haryana?
Polling
Where are those who shout from rooftops to propagate vested interests on these decisions?
BJP leader Sunil Kumar Jakhar claims that the Centre had to step in and restore ₹814 Crores grant for Punjab’s border areas after it lapsed due to non-utilisation, while also accusing the state government of taking credit for centrally funded projects. At the same time, the Bhagwant Mann Government has often highlighted its own development work and accused the Centre of bias. If funds meant for critical infrastructure like roads and bridges were not utilised on time and had to be restored later, does this point to administrative inefficiency at the state level, or is this becoming another political blame game between Centre and state over credit and accountability ?
सुनील कुमार जाखड़ का दावा है कि केंद्र सरकार को पंजाब के सीमा क्षेत्रों के लिए ₹814 करोड़ की ग्रांट को दोबारा बहाल करना पड़ा, क्योंकि राज्य सरकार समय पर इसका उपयोग नहीं कर सकी। साथ ही उन्होंने यह भी आरोप लगाया कि राज्य सरकार केंद्र द्वारा किए गए कार्यों का श्रेय खुद ले रही है। वहीं भगवंत मान की सरकार लगातार अपने विकास कार्यों को सामने रखती रही है और केंद्र पर पक्षपात के आरोप लगाती रही है। अगर सड़क और पुल जैसे महत्वपूर्ण बुनियादी ढांचे के लिए दिए गए फंड समय पर इस्तेमाल नहीं हो पाए और बाद में बहाल करने पड़े, तो क्या यह राज्य स्तर पर प्रशासनिक अक्षमता को दर्शाता है, या फिर यह केंद्र और राज्य के बीच श्रेय और जवाबदेही को लेकर एक और राजनीतिक विवाद बनता जा रहा है ?
With BJP state president Sunil Kumar Jakhar accusing the AAP Government of arm-twisting media, linking police action to suppression of dissent, and invoking sharp jibes at Arvind Kejriwal over alleged double standards, the political battle in Punjab seems to be shifting from governance to control over narrative. The arrests of opposition leaders during a protest tied to a media-linked demolition have further raised questions about whether state power is being used selectively. Is this really about enforcing law and order, or is Punjab witnessing a deeper political struggle over who controls the voice, narrative, and dissent in the state ?
