There are more than 19,500 cooperatives in Punjab, out of which over 3,900 are related to agriculture. An important thing to consider is that if the government wants to bring any new revolution, the best means for it are these in rural areas.
Trending
Has there ever been any discussion about this? It doesn’t seem like it.
With the BJP aggressively expanding its grassroots outreach across Punjab and the Congress still struggling to present a convincing roadmap for revival despite months of internal reshuffling, the political space for a strong Opposition appears increasingly open. This raises an important question for the Akali camp: Instead of remaining divided into multiple factions, is this the moment for all Akali leaders to reunite and present a single, united challenge ? If the Akali Dal continues to stay fragmented while its rivals reorganise, will it end up missing one of the biggest political opportunities in recent years ?
जहाँ भाजपा पूरे पंजाब में ज़मीनी स्तर पर अपना जनसंपर्क अभियान तेज़ कर रही है, वहीं कांग्रेस महीनों की संगठनात्मक कवायद के बावजूद आज तक अपने पुनरुत्थान का कोई ठोस रोडमैप पेश नहीं कर पाई है। ऐसे में एक मज़बूत विपक्ष के लिए राजनीतिक अवसर पहले से कहीं अधिक खुला दिखाई देता है। ऐसे समय में अकाली दल के लिए सबसे बड़ा सवाल यह है, क्या अलग-अलग गुटों में बँटे रहने के बजाय सभी अकाली नेताओं को एकजुट होकर पंजाब के सामने एक मज़बूत विकल्प पेश नहीं करना चाहिए ? यदि अकाली दल इसी तरह बिखरा रहा जबकि उसके राजनीतिक प्रतिद्वंद्वी अपनी रणनीति मजबूत कर रहे हैं, तो क्या वह हाल के वर्षों का सबसे बड़ा राजनीतिक अवसर खो देगा ?
The Punjab and Haryana High Court has questioned why the Aam Aadmi Party Government cites financial constraints in releasing pending Dearness Allowance (DA) to government employees and pensioners, while funds continue to be spent on advertisements and new welfare schemes. The issue goes beyond one payment or one scheme, it raises a fundamental question about the philosophy of governance. When public resources are limited, should the Government first fulfil its existing obligations before announcing new benefits, or is political visibility taking precedence over financial responsibility ? Can the Government truly claim good governance if promises consistently outrank commitments ?
