Let's share your thoughts and enthusiasm about India’s 18-year-old chess champion, his remarkable journey, the challenges he overcame, and how his victory is inspiring young players worldwide.
Proposals - SUNLO
To share your thoughts...
⟶ Go to the home page of the BoloBolo Show app on your Android or iPhone. ⟶ Click on the microphone button icon on the bottom bar. ⟶ Then record your thoughts in a clear voice.
Once a dominant force with a clearly defined 94–23 seat-sharing formula, the Akali Dal–BJP alliance shaped Punjab politics for two decades. Today, the relationship is marked by hesitation rather than harmony. While the BJP is no longer willing to play junior partner, the Akali Dal has shown signs of revival through recent local body election performances, reminding observers that it still commands a base beyond past setbacks. As Punjab moves toward 2027, will Akali Dal and BJP rebuild trust and enter a pre-poll alliance with renegotiated terms, or will both fight separately and keep the door open for a post-poll coalition driven by necessity rather than conviction ? Is the silence about alliance talks a tactical pause or a sign that unity will only come after the verdict ?
कभी 94–23 के स्पष्ट सीट-शेयरिंग फार्मूले के साथ पंजाब की राजनीति पर दो दशकों तक असर रखने वाला अकाली दल–भाजपा गठबंधन आज सामंजस्य से ज़्यादा हिचकिचाहट का शिकार दिखता है। जहां भाजपा अब जूनियर पार्टनर की भूमिका निभाने को तैयार नहीं दिखती, वहीं अकाली दल ने हालिया स्थानीय निकाय चुनावों में बेहतर प्रदर्शन कर यह संकेत दिया है कि झटकों के बावजूद उसका आधार अभी भी कायम है।जैसे-जैसे पंजाब 2027 की ओर बढ़ रहा है, सवाल भावनाओं का नहीं बल्कि रणनीति का है। क्या अकाली दल और भाजपा नई शर्तों के साथ भरोसा दोबारा कायम कर प्री-पोल गठबंधन करेंगे या दोनों अलग-अलग लड़कर नतीजों के बाद मजबूरी में गठबंधन का रास्ता खोलेंगे ? गठबंधन पर चुप्पी क्या रणनीतिक विराम है या संकेत कि एकता सिर्फ फैसले के बाद ही संभव होगी ?
India’s invitation to join Donald Trump’s proposed “Board of Peace” has placed the Modi Government in a strategic bind. The platform is framed as a bold alternative to existing global institutions, yet it concentrates sweeping authority in one leader, weakens the UN’s role, and opens the door to external involvement in conflicts India has long insisted are bilateral, especially Kashmir. With Pakistan already on board and trade pressure from Washington quietly in play, the choice is no longer just diplomatic. Is participation about shaping the agenda from inside or about avoiding the cost of saying no ? And if India delays a clear decision, is it strategic patience or unease with a peace mechanism where power may outweigh principles ?
