According to the latest government data, there are over 25 crore adolescents in the country aged between 10 and 19 years. They need proper nutrition, quality education, and appropriate guidance to build a strong future for the nation.
Rating
In your opinion, is the Government making efforts in this direction?
Sanjeev Arora was once projected by AAP as one of its prominent business-friendly faces in Punjab, a leader who represented entrepreneurship, investment and professional governance. But with the ED investigation widening and fresh raids now reaching individuals and entities allegedly linked to him, the political conversation is shifting rapidly. This raises a question that AAP may find increasingly difficult to avoid when a party builds part of its credibility around clean governance, how much political damage can allegations against a high-profile leader cause, even before the legal process reaches its conclusion ? And as the spotlight continues to intensify around Sanjeev Arora, is this becoming just an individual legal battle, or a larger test of AAP's anti-corruption narrative in Punjab ?
संजीव अरोड़ा को कभी आम आदमी पार्टी के पंजाब में सबसे प्रमुख कारोबारी और प्रशासनिक चेहरों में से एक माना जाता था। उन्हें उद्यमिता, निवेश और पेशेवर शासन के प्रतीक के रूप में पेश किया गया। लेकिन अब जैसे-जैसे ई.डी. की जांच का दायरा बढ़ रहा है और उनसे कथित रूप से जुड़े लोगों तथा संस्थाओं तक छापेमारी पहुंच रही है, राजनीतिक चर्चा का स्वरूप भी बदलता नजर आ रहा है। इससे एक ऐसा सवाल खड़ा हो रहा है जिससे आम आदमी पार्टी के लिए बचना मुश्किल हो सकता है जब कोई पार्टी अपनी पहचान का बड़ा हिस्सा स्वच्छ शासन और ईमानदार राजनीति पर खड़ा करती है, तो उसके किसी बड़े नेता से जुड़े आरोप कानूनी प्रक्रिया पूरी होने से पहले ही कितना राजनीतिक असर डाल सकते हैं ? और जैसे-जैसे संजीव अरोड़ा पर ध्यान बढ़ता जा रहा है, क्या यह सिर्फ एक व्यक्ति की कानूनी लड़ाई रह गई है, या फिर पंजाब में आम आदमी पार्टी की भ्रष्टाचार-विरोधी छवि की भी परीक्षा बनती जा रही है ?
For years, Punjab Congress has spoken about empowering young leaders and preparing the next generation, yet many workers privately complain that the party often offers promising faces visibility without real political authority. Leaders like Brinder Singh Dhillon, Mohit Mohindra and other emerging figures are frequently projected as the future, but when it comes to key decisions, organisational control and electoral strategy, the old hierarchy still appears firmly in charge. This raises an uncomfortable question, is Congress genuinely building its next generation of leadership, or simply keeping young leaders on standby while waiting for the same old faces to deliver different results ? And if the party truly believes its future lies with younger leaders, shouldn't that confidence be reflected in power on the ground rather than just promises from the stage ?
