How can India mitigate risks of losing traditional markets to other basmati-producing countries, and what role does farmer consultation play in these export policies? Share your opinion...
After four years of AAP in power, cabinet ministers like Hardeep Singh Mundian are still announcing outcomes as if governance has just begun, gangsters will be completely eliminated, guarantees are fulfilled “to a large extent,” and the rest are coming soon, all under Bhagwant Mann government. The speeches are polished, the claims are sweeping, and the timelines remain elastic. If this is a mid-term report card, it sounds more like a campaign pitch than an audit. After four full years, voters aren’t asking for intent, they’re asking for proof. So, how should these declarations be read now ?
चार साल तक सत्ता में रहने के बाद भी, हरदीप सिंह मुंडियां जैसे मंत्री ऐसे नतीजों की घोषणा कर रहे हैं मानो शासन अभी-अभी शुरू हुआ हो, गैंगस्टर पूरी तरह खत्म होंगे, गारंटियाँ “काफी हद तक” पूरी हो चुकी हैं और बाकी जल्द आएंगी, वह भी भगवंत मान सरकार के तहत। भाषण चमकदार हैं, दावे बड़े हैं और समय-सीमाएँ लचीली बनी हुई हैं। अगर यह मध्यावधि रिपोर्ट कार्ड है, तो यह ऑडिट से ज़्यादा चुनावी भाषण लगता है। पूरे चार साल बाद, मतदाता नीयत नहीं, सबूत मांग रहे हैं। तो इन बयानों को आज कैसे पढ़ा जाए ?
Rahul Gandhi often frames his politics around protecting the Constitution, equality and democratic values, as seen again in his Republic Day message. Yet despite the consistency of this pitch, it has not translated into wider public acceptance or electoral momentum. If constitutional ideals are meant to unite and inspire, why does his style of politics continue to struggle with voter connect ? Is the message failing to cut through a politics dominated by spectacle and strong personalities or has the Congress been unable to present these values in a way that feels urgent and relevant to everyday concerns ? And in an era where perception often outweighs principle, does idealism itself need a new language to survive politically ?
