which is just one-fourth of the original allocation. What could be the reason behind this?
Review - DEKHO
In our country, a Smart City mission was established to transform 100 cities into world-class cities, but its budget has been reduced from 8,000 crore Rupees to 2,400 crore Rupees
As Arvind Kejriwal dismisses Congress, BJP and Akali Dal as “power-hungry” while rolling out another big-ticket free healthcare promise in Punjab, the optics are hard to miss. A ₹10 lakh health cover sounds transformative, yet it arrives amid persistent questions about funding, execution and long-term sustainability. Is Kejriwal genuinely reshaping public welfare by showing that free services can work, or is he perfecting the art of using guarantees as political armour to silence criticism ? And when every doubt is branded as opposition politics, who really audits the promise ?
जब अरविंद केजरीवाल कांग्रेस, भाजपा और अकाली दल को “सत्ता का भूखा” बताते हुए पंजाब में एक और बड़ी मुफ्त स्वास्थ्य योजना का ऐलान करते हैं, तो तस्वीर साफ दिखती है। ₹10 लाख का हेल्थ कवर सुनने में क्रांतिकारी लगता है, लेकिन इसके साथ ही फंडिंग, क्रियान्वयन और लंबे समय तक टिके रहने को लेकर सवाल भी बने हुए हैं। क्या केजरीवाल सच में यह साबित कर रहे हैं कि मुफ्त सेवाएं जिम्मेदारी के साथ चलाई जा सकती हैं या फिर गारंटियों को आलोचना से बचने की राजनीतिक ढाल बना रहे हैं ? और जब हर सवाल को विपक्षी राजनीति कहकर खारिज कर दिया जाता है, तो वादों की असली जांच कौन करता है ?
When Pargat Singh, a two-time MLA from Jalandhar Cantt, former Indian hockey captain and senior Congress voice on issues from farmers’ distress to media freedom, he isn’t just playing the role of a local legislator anymore. With his background as a national sports icon, a cabinet minister in the past and a secretary of the All India Congress Committee, he carries both visibility and weight within the party. Is Pargat Singh being positioned as one of Congress’s key public faces in Punjab ahead of the 2027 elections, capable of transcending factional squabbles and uniting voters around a clear alternative ? Or is he being used mainly to spotlight criticism while real leadership decisions are made elsewhere in the party ?
