It is the need of the hour to inculcate the habit in youngsters of treating government property as property of one's own and that as a community asset. Rather than vandalizing every now and then, it should be protected at all costs!
The BJP’s decision to project Haryana Chief Minister Nayab Singh Saini as a governance model for Punjab ahead of the Assembly elections reflects a carefully shaped campaign strategy that leans on showcasing performance from neighbouring states. At the same time, the party already has prominent Punjab leaders like Sunil Kumar Jakhar and Captain Amarinder Singh, both of whom joined the BJP after long stints in the Congress. Their political experience adds weight, but their past affiliations also raise quiet questions about internal trust, consistency, and long-term positioning within the party structure. In a state where regional identity, credibility, and continuity often shape voter perception, does this dual approach of projecting external governance models while relying on leaders with shifting political backgrounds point to strategic depth, or does it reveal an underlying hesitation in fully backing a stable, homegrown leadership narrative ?
हरियाणा के मुख्यमंत्री नायब सिंह सैनी को पंजाब चुनावों से पहले एक शासन मॉडल के रूप में प्रस्तुत करने का भाजपा का फैसला एक सोची-समझी चुनावी रणनीति को दर्शाता है, जिसमें पड़ोसी राज्यों के प्रदर्शन को सामने रखा जा रहा है। वहीं दूसरी ओर, पार्टी के पास पंजाब में सुनील कुमार जाखड़ और कैप्टन अमरिंदर सिंह जैसे प्रमुख चेहरे भी हैं, जो लंबे समय तक कांग्रेस में रहने के बाद भाजपा में आए। उनका राजनीतिक अनुभव महत्वपूर्ण है, लेकिन उनकी पिछली राजनीतिक पृष्ठभूमि पार्टी के भीतर भरोसे, स्थिरता और भविष्य की भूमिका को लेकर कुछ सवाल भी खड़े करती है। ऐसे राज्य में जहाँ क्षेत्रीय पहचान, विश्वसनीयता और निरंतरता मतदाताओं की सोच को प्रभावित करती है, क्या बाहरी मॉडल को आगे रखना और पार्टी बदल चुके नेताओं पर भरोसा करना एक मजबूत रणनीति को दिखाता है, या यह अपने ही राज्य के स्थिर नेतृत्व को लेकर हिचकिचाहट को उजागर करता है ?
Farmer unions in Punjab are now placing fresh demands before the BJP ahead of elections, marking a new phase of engagement, but this also brings back memories of the party’s earlier farm laws that had triggered massive protests and deep resentment across the state. With farmers forming a crucial vote base and long-standing issues like MSP, debt relief, and agricultural security still unresolved, the political stakes are significantly high. In such a scenario, where past decisions continue to shape public perception, can the BJP realistically rebuild trust among farmers through this renewed outreach, or does the shadow of earlier policies still weigh too heavily on its credibility ?
