Most of the tree planting campaigns fail! In your opinion what has to change? Share your views on BoloBolo Show App.
Suggestions - SLAH
To share your thoughts...
⟶ Go to the home page of the BoloBolo Show app on your Android or iPhone. ⟶ Click on the microphone button icon on the bottom bar. ⟶ Then record your thoughts in a clear voice.
With Himachal Pradesh heading for the 2027 Assembly elections, JP Nadda’s sudden return to state politics is hard to ignore. After years as BJP president without an internal election and largely operating from Delhi, is Nadda now looking for a state-level role to stay politically relevant ? And does this shift quietly expose how little space BJP’s top structure leaves for leaders to grow through real elections and mass support ?
हिमाचल प्रदेश में 2027 के विधानसभा चुनाव नज़दीक हैं और ऐसे में जे.पी. नड्डा द्वारा राज्य की राजनीति में अचानक बढ़ती सक्रियता को नज़रअंदाज़ करना मुश्किल है। बिना आंतरिक चुनाव के वर्षों तक भाजपा अध्यक्ष रहने और ज़्यादातर समय दिल्ली में काम करने के बाद, क्या नड्डा अब अपनी राजनीतिक प्रासंगिकता बनाए रखने के लिए राज्य स्तर की भूमिका तलाश रहे हैं ? और क्या यह बदलाव चुपचाप भाजपा के शीर्ष ढांचे की उस सच्चाई को उजागर करता है, जहां नेताओं के लिए ज़मीनी चुनाव और जन समर्थन के ज़रिये आगे बढ़ने की गुंजाइश बहुत कम है ?
With Pankaj Chaudhary becoming UP BJP chief through a one-name nomination, the message from the high command is loud and clear. Even Yogi Adityanath, one of BJP’s strongest mass leaders, seems to have little influence over organisational choices in his own state. At the national level, JP Nadda continues as Party President without an election. So the uncomfortable question is no longer about individuals, but about structure: Has the BJP quietly moved from being a cadre-based party to a command-and-control system where leaders rise by approval, not by internal contest ?
