In the current scorching heat, are you remembering the forests, trees, groves, and old orchards, Punjabis? When there’s an area of over 50,000 square kilometers and only about 2,400 square kilometers of forest, the temperature is bound to rise. When new colonies, highways, and forest mafias cut down trees recklessly, where were the leaders of society then? Where is the serious policy? Why wasn't any planning done in time?
Proposals - SUNLO
To share your thoughts...
⟶ Go to the home page of the BoloBolo Show app on your Android or iPhone. ⟶ Click on the microphone button icon on the bottom bar. ⟶ Then record your thoughts in a clear voice.
India’s invitation to join Donald Trump’s proposed “Board of Peace” has placed the Modi Government in a strategic bind. The platform is framed as a bold alternative to existing global institutions, yet it concentrates sweeping authority in one leader, weakens the UN’s role, and opens the door to external involvement in conflicts India has long insisted are bilateral, especially Kashmir. With Pakistan already on board and trade pressure from Washington quietly in play, the choice is no longer just diplomatic. Is participation about shaping the agenda from inside or about avoiding the cost of saying no ? And if India delays a clear decision, is it strategic patience or unease with a peace mechanism where power may outweigh principles ?
डोनल्ड ट्रंप के प्रस्तावित “बोर्ड ऑफ पीस” में शामिल होने का निमंत्रण भारत सरकार के सामने एक जटिल रणनीतिक सवाल खड़ा करता है। इसे मौजूदा वैश्विक संस्थाओं के विकल्प के रूप में पेश किया जा रहा है, लेकिन इसमें एक व्यक्ति के हाथ में अत्यधिक शक्ति, संयुक्त राष्ट्र की भूमिका को कमजोर करना, और उन मुद्दों में बाहरी दखल का जोखिम शामिल है जिन्हें भारत लंबे समय से द्विपक्षीय मानता आया है, खासकर कश्मीर। पाकिस्तान की भागीदारी और वॉशिंगटन से आ रहे व्यापारिक दबाव के बीच यह फैसला अब सिर्फ कूटनीतिक नहीं रह गया है। तो सवाल यह है, क्या इसमें शामिल होना भीतर से एजेंडा प्रभावित करने की कोशिश है या ‘ना’ कहने की कीमत से बचने की मजबूरी ? और अगर भारत सरकार फैसला टालती है, तो क्या यह रणनीतिक धैर्य है या ऐसे शांति मंच को लेकर असहजता, जहाँ सिद्धांतों से ज्यादा ताकत हावी दिखती है ?
As Punjab heads toward the 2027 Assembly elections, the Shiromani Akali Dal has dropped a carefully worded hint that has stirred fresh political speculation. By saying it is open to an alliance with any national party except Congress, SAD has reopened the old question of a possible return to its partnership with the BJP, without naming it outright. With internal divisions within the BJP, mixed signals from its Punjab leadership, and SAD clearly eager for a pre-poll alliance, the bigger question is, is this about shared principles or simple electoral arithmetic to survive 2027 ? And if both sides are hesitating publicly while negotiating privately, who really needs whom more this time ?
