How many years has the government led by the people who claimed their priority is the Panthik agenda ruled the state? Have they ever bothered to collect and register the historic morchas and unlimited sacrifices made by cadres and non-cadres? The maximum of these are unregistered and unlisted.
Rating
What will future generations learn when there is no availability of an authentic document or written manuscripts of those times? How uncaring and casual isn’t it?
The Punjab Congress has long relied on its official social media handles to showcase every important meeting, leadership interaction and display of unity. Yet, after Bhupesh Baghel's politically crucial meeting with the anti-Raja Warring camp, not a single official photograph, video or update was shared by either the Punjab Congress or Baghel himself, despite the meeting involving some of the party's most influential leaders. When a party that usually publicises every event suddenly chooses silence, is it managing an organisational crisis, or attempting to manage the public narrative ?
पंजाब कांग्रेस लंबे समय से अपने आधिकारिक सोशल मीडिया हैंडल्स पर हर महत्वपूर्ण बैठक, नेतृत्व की मुलाकात और एकजुटता की तस्वीरों को प्रमुखता से साझा करती रही है। लेकिन भूपेश बघेल की राजा वड़िंग विरोधी गुट के साथ हुई राजनीतिक रूप से बेहद महत्वपूर्ण बैठक के बाद, पार्टी के सबसे प्रभावशाली नेताओं की मौजूदगी के बावजूद न तो पंजाब कांग्रेस और न ही स्वयं बघेल ने एक भी आधिकारिक फोटो, वीडियो या अपडेट साझा किया। जब कोई पार्टी आमतौर पर हर गतिविधि का प्रचार करती हो, तो ऐसे में अचानक छा गई यह खामोशी क्या संगठनात्मक संकट को संभालने की कोशिश है, या फिर जनता के सामने एक अलग राजनीतिक तस्वीर पेश करने का प्रयास ?
The Congress has often criticised the BJP for centralised decision-making and a lack of internal democracy. Yet in Punjab, when the party's high command retained Amarinder Singh Raja Warring as PPCC Chief despite open resistance from former Chief Minister Charanjit Singh Channi and several senior leaders, dissent was brushed aside. As both the Congress and the BJP insist that their High Command's decisions are final, is there now any real difference between the two parties when it comes to internal democracy, or have both become equally centralised and intolerant of internal dissent ?
