Discuss the implications of the newly enacted The Public Examinations (Prevention of Unfair Means) Act, 2024.
Proposals - SUNLO
To share your viewpoint :-
Go to the home page of the app and, Then click on the microphone button at the bottom bar of the app. Record your message in a clear voice then submit your response.
As the Supreme Court of India flags concerns about criminal proceedings being shaped by “political rivalry” while granting relief to Pawan Khera in a case linked to Himanta Biswa Sarma, does this moment raise deeper questions about how frequently legal battles in Indian politics blur the line between accountability and political score-settling, and whether the judiciary is increasingly being drawn into arenas that should ideally be settled in the political domain ?
जब भारत का सर्वोच्च न्यायालय यह चिंता जताता है कि आपराधिक कार्यवाहियां “राजनीतिक प्रतिद्वंद्विता” से प्रभावित हो रही हैं और पवन खेड़ा को हिमंत बिस्वा सरमा से जुड़े मामले में राहत देता है, तो क्या यह स्थिति यह बड़ा सवाल खड़ा करती है कि भारतीय राजनीति में कानूनी लड़ाइयां कितनी बार जवाबदेही और राजनीतिक बदले की भावना के बीच की रेखा को धुंधला कर देती हैं, और क्या न्यायपालिका को उन मुद्दों में खींचा जा रहा है जिन्हें असल में राजनीतिक स्तर पर सुलझाया जाना चाहिए ?
After initially opposing the idea of a caste census, Narendra Modi went on to announce it with strong political messaging, yet more than a year later, there is still no clear roadmap, no timeline, and no visible consultation with states or experts, leaving even basic questions about how the exercise will be conducted unanswered. Does this widening gap between announcement and action point to a pattern where politically sensitive decisions are amplified early but quietly slowed down later, or is the Government deliberately pacing the process to avoid the complex social and electoral consequences such data could trigger ?
