Project Cheetah: Displacing 5,000 people for lions and rushing cheetah translocation with no social impact surveys— Are we truly prioritizing conservation?
Review - DEKHO
With only 6,500 Cheetahs left in the wild, can we afford the risks to their welfare vis-a vis local communities?
The Modi Government has not allowed a detailed parliamentary debate on China despite ongoing border tensions, rising trade dependence, and growing strategic concerns. At a time when China remains India’s biggest strategic challenge, the larger question is whether keeping the issue out of full public debate reflects careful diplomatic handling or avoids necessary political accountability. When a major external threat continues without open discussion, does Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s approach signal strategic control and stability or is a transparent parliamentary debate essential to build national clarity and unity ?
चीन के साथ जारी सीमा तनाव, बढ़ती व्यापार निर्भरता और रणनीतिक चुनौतियों के बावजूद मोदी सरकार ने इस मुद्दे पर संसद में विस्तृत चर्चा की अनुमति नहीं दी है। ऐसे समय में जब चीन भारत की सबसे बड़ी रणनीतिक चुनौती माना जा रहा है, बड़ा सवाल यह है कि क्या इस मुद्दे को खुली बहस से दूर रखना सावधानीपूर्ण कूटनीतिक रणनीति है या जरूरी राजनीतिक जवाबदेही से बचना। जब इतना बड़ा बाहरी खतरा मौजूद हो, तो क्या प्रधानमंत्री नरेंद्र मोदी का यह दृष्टिकोण रणनीतिक नियंत्रण और स्थिरता का संकेत है या राष्ट्रीय स्पष्टता और एकजुटता के लिए संसद में पारदर्शी चर्चा जरूरी है ?
The withdrawal of security for Punjabi singers like Gippy Grewal and Jordan Sandhu has sparked a sharp political debate, especially in a state still shadowed by the killing of Sidhu Moosewala after a similar reduction in protection. With the decisions coming amid active gangster threats and close on the heels of their interactions with opposition leaders, and with no detailed public explanation so far, the larger question is whether security reviews are based strictly on threat assessment or getting caught in political optics.
