Suggest in your voice message about improving quality of life and how to make life better & healthy ?
Proposals - SUNLO
To share your viewpoint :-
Go to the home page of the BoloBolo Show app and, Then click on the microphone button at the bottom bar of the app. Record your message in a clear voice then submit your response.
Ravneet Singh Bittu built a strong electoral record during his time in Congress, winning the 2009 Lok Sabha election from Anandpur Sahib and later securing two consecutive wins from Ludhiana in 2014 and 2019. However, after shifting to the BJP, he lost the 2024 Lok Sabha election from Ludhiana. Despite this setback, he was elevated to the Rajya Sabha and has since been projected as one of the party’s strongest voices in Punjab. This raises a sharper question. Did the BJP push Ravneet Singh Bittu forward mainly due to the lack of a strong and reliable Sikh face in the state, and more importantly, can a leader who could not secure a direct electoral win still be seen as a credible Chief Ministerial face, or does that gap between projection and performance raise serious doubts ?
रवनीत सिंह बिट्टू का राजनीतिक सफर कांग्रेस के समय एक मजबूत चुनावी रिकॉर्ड के साथ सामने आया, जहां उन्होंने 2009 में आनंदपुर साहिब से लोकसभा चुनाव जीता और बाद में 2014 और 2019 में लुधियाना से लगातार दो बार जीत हासिल कीं। हालांकि, भाजपा में शामिल होने के बाद वे 2024 का लोकसभा चुनाव लुधियाना से हार गए। इस हार के बावजूद उन्हें राज्यसभा भेजा गया और तब से उन्हें पंजाब में पार्टी की एक मजबूत आवाज़ के रूप में पेश किया जा रहा है। इससे एक बड़ा सवाल खड़ा होता है। क्या भाजपा ने रवनीत सिंह बिट्टू को आगे इसलिए बढ़ाया क्योंकि राज्य में एक मजबूत और भरोसेमंद सिख चेहरा नहीं था, और क्या जो नेता सीधे चुनाव में जीत हासिल नहीं कर सका, उसे एक विश्वसनीय मुख्यमंत्री चेहरा माना जा सकता है, या फिर यह अंतर उनकी छवि पर सवाल खड़ा करता है?
With Pinarayi Vijayan taking a direct swipe at Rahul Gandhi’s political acumen ahead of the Kerala polls, the attack lands where it hurts most, leadership credibility and decision-making. When a sitting Chief Minister questions not just strategy but the very judgment of a national leader, it raises an uncomfortable question: is this just political sparring, or does it echo a wider perception that Rahul Gandhi struggles to read the ground and take firm calls at crucial moments ? So the question is, when such doubts are voiced openly by rivals, is Rahul Gandhi’s leadership being seriously challenged on merit, or is this simply exposing a pattern of weak political instincts that opponents are now capitalising on ?
